P&O Ferries mass firings of UK crew members outrage unions

By AP News

Share:

LONDON (AP) — Unions protested at British ports Friday, demanding the government step in to save jobs and protect key trade routes after major ferry operator P&O Ferries fired 800 U.K. crew members to replace them with cheaper contract staff.

Vehicles queue to enter from the outskirts of the Port of Dover in Kent, England, Thursday March 17, 2022. One of the largest ferry operators in the United Kingdom has fired 800 crew members without notice and plans to replace them with cheaper staff. (Gareth Fuller/PA via AP)

LONDON (AP) — Unions protested at British ports Friday, demanding the government step in to save jobs and protect key trade routes after major ferry operator P&O Ferries fired 800 U.K. crew members to replace them with cheaper contract staff.

P&O has canceled all its ferry crossings between Britain and continental Europe, threatening to disrupt the movement of travelers and goods across the English Channel and North Sea for days.

The British government expressed outrage at the mass firings — many done over Zoom message — but suggested it could do little to reverse them. The staff cuts came after P&O received millions in British government aid during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Transport Secretary Grant Shapps said he felt shock and dismay at P&O’s “insensitive and brutal treatment of its employees.”

During a Conservative party meeting in Blackpool, northwest England, Shapps said he was “looking at whether there are contracts the government might have with P&O” that could be used to pressure the company.

Unions accused the Conservative government of taking too light a touch with big businesses. Gordon Martin of the RMT transport union accused the government of crying “crocodile Tory tears” and said weak British labor laws were allowing “bandit capitalism” to become rife.

Unions have long objected to “fire and rehire” policies that let companies fire staff and reemploy them on worse terms. Under British labor laws, such extreme action is only meant to be done after extensive consultation with staff.

“We don’t believe this was the case for P&O staff, but we are looking into this very carefully,” said Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s spokesman, Max Blain.

He said it was “too early to be definitive” about whether P&O had breached labor laws.

The company's drastic action could cause wider economic disruption. The company canceled ferry crossings on routes linking England to Ireland, Northern Ireland the Netherlands and France, including the cross-Channel Dover-Calais route that carries a large chunk of U.K.-Europe passengers and freight.

The government said the suspension could last a week to 10 days but insisted it did not expect “major disruption” because other ferry companies continued to ply the routes.

The ferry operator, a unit of Dubai-government owned logistics giant DP World, acknowledged its decision had “caused distress” to the fired staff, but said it had “concluded that the business wouldn’t survive without fundamentally changed crewing arrangements.”

P&O said it had no choice but to cut costs after the pandemic hammered its finances, leading it to post a 100 million pound ($132 million) loss last year.

Chief executive Peter Hebblethwaite said replacing unionized U.K. seafarers with employees hired through the company International Ferry Management would cut P&O's labor costs in half, according to a letter obtained by news site Mirror Online.

P&O denied it had been heavy-handed in removing crews who initially refused to leave their vessels after being fired on Thursday.

“Contrary to rumors, none of our people wore balaclavas nor were they directed to use handcuffs nor force,” the company said in a statement.

Several hundred ferry crew and union members rallied Friday beside the famous white cliffs in the Channel port of Dover, carrying banners that said, “Save our seafarers” and “Save Britain's ferries.” Another 200 protested in the northeast England port of Hull, walking past the berthed ferry Pride of Hull before banging on the doors of the ferry terminal building.

Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham said the government should consider nationalizing P&O.

“I say to the prime minister: You have to step in, and you have to deliver on your commitment to strengthen employment law so this kind of gangster practice can’t be allowed to happen any more," Burnham told a rally in the northwest port of Liverpool.

The opposition Labour Party demanded the Conservative government suspend DP World’s contracts and licenses and claw back the 4.3 million pounds ($5.6 million) it gave the company in emergency funding during the pandemic.

Two unions representing P&O staff, Nautilus International and RMT, said they were preparing legal action against the company.

“This is clearly illegal,” Nautilus General-Secretary Mark Dickinson said. “It’s a dark day in the shipping industry.”

P&O Ferries’ ultimate owner is Dubai World, a holding company that says it is committed to “generating value” for its shareholder, the government of Dubai. The company’s chairman is Sheikh Ahmed Bin Said Al Maktoum, a member of the Dubai royal family.

Dubai World’s holdings include the global logistics company DP World, which owns P&O Ferries. The company operates ports, shipping terminals and other facilities that employ more than 71,000 people in 69 countries around the world. In November, the company became the title sponsor of the European professional golf tour, which is now known as the DP World Tour.

DP World on March 10 said net income rose 5.9%, to $896 million last year. Revenue jumped 26%, to $10.8 billion, after it acquiring assets in the U.S., India, South Korea, Ukraine, Angola and Canada.

Share:

Author: AP News

This article does not provide any financial advice and is not a recommendation to deal in any securities or product. Investments may fall in value and an investor may lose some or all of their investment. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.

Originally published by Associated Press Valuethemarkets.com, Digitonic Ltd (and our owners, directors, officers, managers, employees, affiliates, agents and assigns) are not responsible for the content or accuracy of this article. The information included in this article is based solely on information provided by the company or companies mentioned above.

Sign up for Investing Intel Newsletter