US Government's Bold Move: The New Frontier of U.S. Industrial Policy

By Patricia Miller

Oct 16, 2025

2 min read

The Trump administration’s direct equity stakes in Intel and MP Materials mark a major shift in U.S. industrial policy—turning Washington from funder to shareholder in critical sectors.

#What Happened

The Biden administration relied heavily on subsidies and tax incentives—such as the CHIPS Act and the Inflation Reduction Act—to strengthen key U.S. industries. The Trump administration has now taken that model a step further, converting some of those funds into direct equity stakes in major American companies.

In August 2025, the federal government finalized an agreement to acquire about 9.9 percent of Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC), transforming previously allocated CHIPS funds into shares. The structure gives the government a passive ownership role without board seats, though it retains limited rights tied to national-security conditions. A similar deal granted the government a 15 percent stake in MP Materials, a leading rare-earth producer, as part of an effort to secure domestic mineral supply chains.

Officials describe the policy as a strategic response to China’s dominance in semiconductors and critical minerals. The new approach blends industrial policy with investment strategy—making the federal government not just a funder but a shareholder in industries deemed essential to national interests.

#Why It Matters

This marks a significant shift in how Washington supports private enterprise. By holding direct stakes, the government is aligning financial outcomes with national-security and industrial goals.

For investors, that could cut both ways. On one hand, a government stake can provide reassurance of long-term support and stability. On the other, it introduces new uncertainties—potential political influence, changes in regulatory treatment, and evolving expectations around corporate behavior.

Legal scholars have also noted that these arrangements raise questions about the limits of executive authority to acquire equity and how such holdings interact with existing securities and appropriations laws.

#What to Watch Next

  • Future investments: Treasury officials have suggested that similar equity models may expand into other strategic areas, including pharmaceuticals, clean energy, and defense technology.

  • Legal scrutiny: Courts and Congress may weigh in on whether converting grant funds into equity stakes aligns with current statutory authority.

  • Market impact: Investors will be watching how these government stakes affect valuations, governance practices, and broader market confidence.

  • Corporate behavior: Companies receiving public investment could face added expectations around transparency, domestic manufacturing, and workforce commitments.

#Quick Take

The Trump administration’s move from subsidy provider to minority shareholder represents a bold new experiment in American industrial policy. It may strengthen strategic industries but also blurs the line between private enterprise and state participation—reshaping how markets interpret the role of government in the economy.

#Broader Market Angle

The ripple effects could extend across technology, infrastructure, and energy manufacturing, where firms such as AMD, Nvidia, and major battery producers stand to benefit from similar policy signals.

Explore how top semiconductor firms are performing in 2025, offering insight into how companies like Intel and Nvidia are positioned amid shifting U.S. industrial policy. The Best Performing Chip Stocks of 2025

Important Notice And Disclaimer

This article does not provide any financial advice and is not a recommendation to deal in any securities or product. Investments may fall in value and an investor may lose some or all of their investment. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.