BIP-110 Bitcoin Soft Fork Attempts and Its Fallout

By Patricia Miller

2 min read

BIP-110 aimed to reduce data in Bitcoin transactions but stalled quickly due to lack of miner support, raising neutral concerns.

#What happened with BIP-110?

BIP-110, a proposed soft fork intended to remove extensive non-financial data from Bitcoin transactions, achieved very limited success before faltering. After reaching block 961,633 on August 9, the minority chain came to a complete stop, while the primary Bitcoin network continued to function without disruption.

This controversial soft fork aimed to address what some refer to as transaction spam, specifically targeting non-essential data like NFTs and similar payloads that consume valuable block space. BIP-110 was devised as a temporary solution, projected to last a year, and required miners to reject blocks lacking a designated signal that indicated compliance with the new protocol. However, this endeavor faced immediate challenges when it became clear that it needed at least 55% of mining hash power in support to move forward. Ultimately, nearly all miners, about 99.85% of hash power, remained aligned with the main Bitcoin chain, rendering BIP-110 ineffective.

#Why did miners resist BIP-110?

The lack of support from miners highlights significant concerns regarding the neutrality of the Bitcoin network. Prominent figures, such as PlanB and Michael Saylor, expressed apprehension that implementing transaction filtering based on content could set a concerning precedent. Initially focusing on NFTs, this filtering could potentially extend to rejecting transactions from specific addresses or jurisdictions in the future. The overwhelming refusal to support BIP-110 reflected miners' deep-seated concern about maintaining the decentralization and integrity of Bitcoin.

A sharper way to see the markets in just 5 minutes.

Same news, different lens. We cut through the noise and hand you the overlooked ideas and the deeper read the crowd misses. Join 38,000+ investors seeing the markets differently.

I agree to the privacy policy.

#How did exchanges react?

Despite the situation surrounding BIP-110, major exchanges like Coinbase and Kraken reported no interruptions in their services. Trading, along with deposits and withdrawals, proceeded without any noticeable disruptions, indicating that the split did not significantly impact users or the broader market for Bitcoin.

In summary, BIP-110 illustrates the complex dynamics at play within the Bitcoin community and the challenges of introducing significant changes to the network. The swift rejection by miners serves as a reminder of the importance of consensus when it comes to evolving blockchain protocols.

A sharper way to see the markets in just 5 minutes.

Same news, different lens. We cut through the noise and hand you the overlooked ideas and the deeper read the crowd misses. Join 38,000+ investors seeing the markets differently.

I agree to the privacy policy.

Explore more on these topics:

Important Notice And Disclaimer

This article does not provide any financial advice and is not a recommendation to deal in any securities or product. Investments may fall in value and an investor may lose some or all of their investment. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.