Evaluating the Dual Impact of AI: Benefits and Risks for Investors

By Patricia Miller

Jun 12, 2026

2 min read

KPMG's study reveals AI's dual impact; 73% see benefits but 56% report errors from unverified outputs. How should investors respond?

The recent KPMG study on trust in artificial intelligence surveyed over 48,000 individuals across 47 countries. The findings are significant for anyone following AI advancements. An impressive 73% of respondents reported personal benefits from AI, primarily in terms of increased efficiency.

However, there is a critical aspect that raises alarms. The study revealed that 56% of participants had made mistakes due to reliance on unverified AI outputs. This error rate indicates a substantial risk for businesses that use AI without adequate human oversight.

#What Do AI Hallucinations Mean for My Investments?

These findings highlight a concept known as hallucinations, where AI confidently presents false information as if it were factual. This issue was notably highlighted when EY had to retract a cybersecurity report in May 2026, revealing that a significant number of citations were completely fabricated by AI. Similarly, Deloitte faced backlash after a report was found to contain AI hallucinations, resulting in partial refunds on a government contract.

The KPMG study, conducted in association with the University of Melbourne, illustrates this tension present in numerous industries globally, from Tokyo to Toronto. While AI contributes to tangible productivity gains, it simultaneously creates new categories of risk. To mitigate these risks, professional services firms are investing heavily in AI governance frameworks. Their goal is to balance the benefits of AI efficiency with the necessity for human oversight, ultimately ensuring accurate outputs for their clients.

#How Should Investors Approach AI Adoption?

For investors monitoring the AI landscape, the findings from KPMG should be taken as a cautious reminder. While the reported 73% benefit statistic explains the growing adoption of AI technologies across various sectors, the concerning 56% error rate calls for a more discerning approach. Treating AI outputs as infallible without proper human verification poses significant risks that need to be acknowledged and managed. As industries continue to integrate AI, understanding these complexities will be essential for making informed investment decisions.

Important Notice And Disclaimer

This article does not provide any financial advice and is not a recommendation to deal in any securities or product. Investments may fall in value and an investor may lose some or all of their investment. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.