#What Are the Key Changes in Ethereum’s Glamsterdam Upgrade?
Glamsterdam has successfully passed its important technical milestone as Ethereum's next major protocol upgrade. This upgrade follows the Fusaka release and has activated its final development network with all planned Ethereum Improvement Proposals in place. A remarkable target for Glamsterdam is to set a new gas limit floor at 200 million, which is approximately 3.3 times higher than the existing cap of around 60 million.
The culmination of efforts during the Soldøgn interoperability event, held in May 2026 in Svalbard, allowed core developers to finalize the upgrade’s specifications. This event helped stress-test cross-client compatibility prior to starting the final development network.
#Which Ethereum Improvement Proposals are Included in Glamsterdam?
Two Ethereum Improvement Proposals stand out in this upgrade. The first is EIP-7732, which introduces enshrined proposer-builder separation. This technical adjustment is intended to integrate the relationship between block validators and builders directly into the Ethereum protocol. By doing so, the aim is to mitigate risks associated with miner extractable value that may lead to centralization.
The second important proposal is EIP-7928, focusing on block-level access lists. This feature allows the network to anticipate which parts of the blockchain will be engaged by a particular block. As a result, it enables parallel processing of transactions that don’t interfere with each other, which can drive down transaction fees and enhance execution times.
In addition to these main features, Glamsterdam includes a broader initiative to adjust gas pricing, which seeks to lower fees associated with complex computations while raising costs for state creations and storage.
#When Can We Expect Increased Throughput from the Upgrade?
Developers are targeting an ambitious goal of achieving around 10,000 transactions per second following this upgrade. The feasibility of reaching this target relies heavily on how effectively block-level access lists facilitate parallel processing. The theory is that if transactions do not compete for the same blockchain state, validators can handle them simultaneously. However, the actual degree of parallelism will fluctuate based on actual user behavior on the chain.
#How Does Glamsterdam Fit into Ethereum’s Upgrade Timeline?
Ethereum has established a consistent rhythm of biannual hard forks, with Fusaka launching in December 2025 and Glamsterdam expected to roll out in the latter half of 2026. The development community is also preparing for a future upgrade tentatively named Hegotá.
Beyond its technical aspects, Glamsterdam signifies a significant shift in Ethereum’s architecture. The discussion surrounding enshrined proposer-builder separation has taken place within Ethereum's research community for years, and transitioning it from theoretical discourse to a live development environment with all proposals activated signifies genuine progress.
#What Implications Does This Hold for Investors?
Increased transaction throughput combined with lower fees may stimulate greater on-chain activity. As transaction volumes rise, there could be more Ethereum burned through EIP-1559’s fee structure, thus impacting ETH’s supply dynamics. Should the projection of 10,000 transactions per second come close to realization, the uptick in transactions could substantially increase burn pressure on Ethereum, which may positively influence its value.
Moreover, changes in gas pricing—reducing costs for computation-heavy operations—could lead to innovative protocol designs that may not have been feasible at previous fee levels. However, the journey from final development stage to a production hard fork involves essential public 테스트 deployments, client scrutiny, and careful coordination among numerous independent teams.
Investors should monitor shifting validator economics under the enshrined proposer-builder separation, as any disturbance to the miner extractable value supply chain could temporarily impact staking yields and the profitability of validators. Such variations may ripple through liquid staking protocols and their associated tokens.