Proposed Legislation to Ban Political Betting by Congress Members

By Patricia Miller

Jun 18, 2026

2 min read

Rep. Bryan Steil seeks to ban Congress members from betting on political outcomes through prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi.

#What Legislation is on the Horizon for Political Betting?

Legislation has been introduced by Representative Bryan Steil, a Republican from Wisconsin, to ban members of Congress, their families, and congressional staff from engaging in political betting through prediction markets. This legislative push specifically targets popular platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, which have gained significant traction as places to wager on elections and policy decisions.

As part of this initiative, the restrictions will be appended to H.R. 7008, known as the Stop Insider Trading Act. Steil's objective is to initiate a House vote by the summer of 2026.

#What is Driving This Bipartisan Movement?

Bipartisan support for this initiative is already evident, as the Senate passed S. Res. 708 in late April 2026, prohibiting prediction market trading for senators and their staff. Since January 2026, over ten prediction-market-related bills have been introduced, reflecting the growing concern regarding the integrity of these markets.

The urgency for such measures accelerated in May 2026 when the House Oversight Committee began investigating suspicious trading activities on Polymarket and Kalshi, particularly those related to election events. The focus of this investigation is whether individuals privy to insider information were leveraging these markets for personal gain.

#How Will This Impact Prediction Market Platforms?

Polymarket and Kalshi, the leading platforms in this arena, find themselves in distinctly different regulatory environments. Kalshi operates as a Commodity Futures Trading Commission-regulated exchange, commanding approximately 89% of the U.S. prediction market share as of April 2026. In contrast, Polymarket's reliance on stablecoins for collateral and settlement places it within a regulatory gray area in the cryptocurrency sector.

Kalshi has successfully navigated numerous regulatory challenges to offer political contracts in the U.S., including a significant court victory against the CFTC in 2024. Conversely, Polymarket's crypto-based infrastructure presents challenges in enforcing identity verification requirements. This difficulty arises from the inherently anonymous nature of cryptocurrency trading, complicating efforts to confirm whether users are members of Congress or their families. Both platforms are committed to preventing insider trading and adhering to existing regulations but face unique compliance hurdles.

The proposed legislation will specifically target political contracts, leaving non-political prediction markets, such as sports betting, unaffected.

#What Are the Implications for Investors?

The potential restrictions on political betting may have significant ramifications for investors. Although members of Congress and their staff represent a small segment of total users on these platforms, the introduction of over ten related bills in a single congressional session speaks volumes about the growing scrutiny. For Polymarket, which has seen billions in trade volume largely fueled by political events since the 2024 elections, the prospect of increased oversight may lead to higher compliance costs.

If new regulations mandate strict identity verification for political contracts, Polymarket's architecture, which is optimized for cryptocurrency, could become a liability. Simultaneously, Kalshi, with its established regulatory framework, may expand its market dominance as it is better positioned to meet compliance demands.

Explore more on these topics:

Important Notice And Disclaimer

This article does not provide any financial advice and is not a recommendation to deal in any securities or product. Investments may fall in value and an investor may lose some or all of their investment. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.