Understanding the Impact of Hyperliquid's Governance Changes on USDH Ticker Decisions

By Patricia Miller

Sep 11, 2025

1 min read

Hyperliquid enhances community control by removing team-staked tokens from USDH vote weighting, opening doors for Paxos' proposal.

#How Does the Removal of Team-Staked Tokens Impact Governance?

Removing team-staked $HYPE tokens from the validator weighting system significantly impacts governance and community control. This is a strategic decision aimed at enhancing fairness and giving more power to the community in the decision-making process related to the USDH ticker, a critical aspect of the stablecoin ecosystem.

This governance adjustment has led to Native Market's voting weight being reduced from 75% to 66%. Such a change creates a more democratic process when it comes to deciding on the stablecoin ticker. By diminishing the influence of insider staked tokens, the focus shifts towards a more community-driven approach in the partnership decisions for USDH.

#What Opportunities Does this Open for Paxos?

The exclusion of team-staked tokens broadens the potential for Paxos to secure the USDH ticker, which could be pivotal for its strategy within the market. Paxos has presented a compelling proposal that includes offering 95% of the USDH reserve yield for $HYPE token buybacks. This incentive could appeal to investors and bolster community support.

In conclusion, by enhancing community involvement and reducing insider influence, Hyperliquid's governance change positions USDH for a more equitable future and opens doors for new partnerships, particularly with Paxos. This marks a significant shift towards a governance framework that prioritizes stakeholder engagement and community input, crucial for the long-term success of any cryptocurrency initiative.

Important Notice And Disclaimer

This article does not provide any financial advice and is not a recommendation to deal in any securities or product. Investments may fall in value and an investor may lose some or all of their investment. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.