Understanding the New Framework for Payment Stablecoins by the Federal Reserve

By Patricia Miller

Jun 18, 2026

2 min read

The Federal Reserve proposes rules for stablecoins, introducing customer identification programs and 1:1 reserve requirements, reshaping the market.

The Federal Reserve has initiated a significant regulatory shift that may redefine the landscape for stablecoins in the United States. A recent notice of proposed rulemaking outlines a series of requirements designed for payment stablecoin issuers, commonly referred to as permissible payment stablecoin issuers. At the forefront of this initiative is the establishment of formal customer identification programs aimed at combating money laundering.

This proposal stems from the GENIUS Act, a groundbreaking piece of legislation enacted in July 2025 that established the first federal framework targeting payment stablecoins. Supported by Jerome Powell and abstained by the newly confirmed Fed Chair, Kevin Warsh, this proposal marks a pivotal moment in stablecoin regulation.

#What Are the New Requirements for Stablecoin Issuers?

The new framework mandates that permissible payment stablecoin issuers develop customer identification programs, essentially a set of procedures to verify customer identities. Beyond this, the GENIUS Act stipulates a 1:1 reserve requirement whereby issuers must hold reserves in high-quality liquid assets. This not only encompasses stringent verification but also enforces policies for quick redemption, ensuring that token holders can redeem their assets efficiently. Importantly, under the new rules, these issuers are prohibited from offering interest or yield to token holders.

In collaboration with the Federal Reserve, the Treasury Department, FinCEN, and OFAC have joined forces to address anti-money laundering and sanctions compliance for stablecoin operations. Additionally, the National Credit Union Administration has proposed its own standards as of mid-May 2026, inviting public feedback until mid-July.

#How Might the Leadership Dynamic Impact Regulatory Implementation?

With Warsh having recently taken the helm at the Federal Reserve, his decision to abstain from voting might suggest he is reserving the flexibility to influence the final regulations. While Jerome Powell was instrumental in the genesis of this proposal, Warsh will play a crucial role in how these rules are enforced and adapted moving forward.

#Who Stands to Gain or Lose from These Regulations?

Industry leaders such as Circle and Paxos have established comprehensive Know Your Customer frameworks, positioning them well to adapt to these new requirements. However, smaller issuers and newer entities may struggle to comply, significantly raising the entry barriers for the US stablecoin market. International providers unwilling to adhere to US anti-money laundering requirements may find themselves excluded from dollar-based markets, further shaping a landscape dominated by compliant US issuers.

Investors should also pay close attention to the definition of high-quality liquid assets tied to the 1:1 reserve requirement. A narrow interpretation could limit issuers' flexibility in managing reserves, potentially compressing their profit margins and prompting market consolidation.

The GENIUS Act explicitly frames US-regulated stablecoins as vehicles for enhancing the dollar's prominence in digital transactions. The government is banking on the notion that properly regulated private-sector stablecoins can extend the dollar's influence more effectively than a government-issued digital currency would.

Important Notice And Disclaimer

This article does not provide any financial advice and is not a recommendation to deal in any securities or product. Investments may fall in value and an investor may lose some or all of their investment. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.