Dimon: Bank rules should change after Silicon Valley Bank

By AP News

In this article

  • Loading...
  • Want to see what you should be buying? Check out our top picks.

JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon told investors Tuesday that government and banks should work to adjust industry regulations following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank last month

Banking Crisis Dimon

NEW YORK (AP) — JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon told investors Tuesday that government and banks should work to adjust industry regulations following the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank last month, saying that the financial system needs to be adjusted so that one bank's failure does not “cause undue panic and financial harm.”

The comments, made in Dimon's letter to JPMorgan Chase shareholders, were his first since the two banks failed. Dimon, the chairman and chief executive of the nation's largest bank, is a veteran of the 2008 financial crisis, and one of the last senior executives remaining at a Wall Street firm since the industry nearly collapsed 15 years ago.

Dimon said in his letter there was plenty of blame to go around for Silicon Valley Bank's failure. The bank's management poorly handled the bank's interest rate risk, leaving it too exposed to the Federal Reserve's rising interest rates, he said. Regulators like the Fed did not adequately understand the risks in SVB's balance sheet soon enough to push the bank to adjust course before it was too late.

Lastly Dimon partially blamed venture capitalists and the tech community, whose collective decision to pull their money out of SVB caused the bank to fail through a traditional bank run.

“The unknown risk was that SVB’s over 35,000 corporate clients – and activity within them – were controlled by a small number of venture capital companies and moved their deposits in lockstep,” Dimon wrote.

“This is not to absolve bank management – it’s just to make clear that this wasn’t the finest hour for many players,” he added.

Dimon acknowledged in his letter what was seen anecdotally throughout this crisis: depositors flocked to the nation's biggest banks which are seen as “too big to fail” which arguably gives them an implicit government backstop in times of panic. But Dimon said the country benefits from smaller banks and community banks because they serve more local populations that their bigger rivals.

“While it is true that this bank crisis ‘benefited’ larger banks due to the inflow of deposits they received from smaller institutions, the notion that this meltdown was good for them in any way is absurd,” he said.

Dimon's annual letter to shareholders is often a must-read for bankers, policymakers and the media as Dimon typically goes into great detail about the issues facing the industry as well as the U.S. and global economy.

Dimon was the the go-to banker for Washington during the 2008 financial crisis, buying Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual in government-brokered deals to stop further panic in the banking system. He reprised that role last month, as the White House turned to Dimon to find fellow banks to come to the rescue of First Republic Bank, which came dangerously close to failing after Silicon Valley and Signature Bank failed.

Explore more on these topics:



This article does not provide any financial advice and is not a recommendation to deal in any securities or product. Investments may fall in value and an investor may lose some or all of their investment. Past performance is not an indicator of future performance.

Originally published by Associated Press Valuethemarkets.com, Digitonic Ltd (and our owners, directors, officers, managers, employees, affiliates, agents and assigns) are not responsible for the content or accuracy of this article. The information included in this article is based solely on information provided by the company or companies mentioned above.

Sign up for Investing Intel Newsletter